|
| DSH 597
2 W- c V! P7 I: |
6 ^3 v" B+ r* ~% Y | Verificaton of main contact position, position of the actuator
) K' w. k( C8 A5 @ | 8.3.3.9+ Q9 @% {2 R- C
| 60947-1(ed.1);am1 & 60947-1(ed.2) & 60947-1(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3) & 60947-1(ed.3);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3);am2 & 60947-1(ed.4) & 60947-1(ed.5) & 60947-1(ed.5);am1 & 60947-2(ed.1);am1 & 60947-2(ed.2) & 60947-2(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-2(ed.3) & 60947-2(ed.4) & 60947-2(ed.4);am1
# f. O6 @( b A. b `' x2 K$ ?, Q2 e F | ! n4 |+ g0 K( I6 q
Standard(s): IEC60947-1, IEC60947-
( f* \% @; [0 M* N2
3 e, C- n( p$ H0 c; [! hSub clause(s):# ], n6 D ]$ y+ k6 n* [
8.2.5.3 of IEC60947-1 and4 o2 N5 }3 t) y* S+ p
8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-25 ]3 L7 d7 N/ h' ]6 c% |; s
DSH
D4 ?7 _- v- A; V P597! |& H* D/ H$ V! E c+ m1 v
Subject:
6 e5 }6 P5 A5 z/ M- o0 I) LVerification of main contact
3 c- F4 u2 }8 B' K9 ?0 Eposition, position of the actuator6 w1 ^2 \# B; a7 K+ w0 V, @
Key words:
3 \4 O3 l1 `1 a* @* ]. s9 R+ J$ D- suitable for isolation; i1 K. W% y1 E: |9 i. w
- indication of contact
7 ~- { C, @& t# n6 Nposition2 v) X% J5 i8 g. L( Q' U
Decision approved by
7 h) ]! }3 X" |$ P5 S; `the 44th CTL Plenary
0 y+ F) d$ E. }# l/ jmeeting 2007' t9 ?5 n3 i4 v& D# [" O% f, k
Question:9 ^3 p9 v6 M% {
Verification of the main contact position is conducted only on products suitable for isolation. This is an
8 X5 ?, i- o# s* S& fadditional requirement to be verified.) I; F! Z! K' d# o" ~
Q1: After the 3F test, the actuator comes to rest in a position between the trip and open position (which is
3 t: C( e" z8 K0 v4 ~# d" P' W# fneither consistent with the tripped nor with the open position markings as indicated on the product). Is this a, B R2 @, C; q, g7 i9 L
pass when tested according 8.2.5.3 of IEC60947-1?
& C5 i' I% s% h5 ?% p/ i( WQ2: If the answer of Q1 is yes, is this in conflict with the general constructional requirements of 7.1.5? How1 F, K6 x, k0 P! t9 C: T8 @; z
should section 7.1.6.1 (additional (constructional) requirements) be interpreted?
. h- i; v& M9 Q8 E/ F8 b# Y# r. ZProposal:% n6 E2 I3 Z( @# n U! D& J
There are two possibilities, depending on the features of the breaker:. k1 t! ^' N. k; l1 d
1) The indicator is the actuator, and it is the only position indicator, or! M6 D( P [, Z: ~! Q, _
2) There is an actuator that may show the operating position, but in addition there is a
( P: k2 _& }. w, v3 |& tseparate position indicator.( X S! } ^2 L1 {1 F. [
For construction per item 1, this result is not acceptable% m( d* v7 }$ e* k9 e
For construction per item 2, the result described is acceptable if the separate position
% a7 ?4 w3 l8 d- @: p/ U6 Q' oindicator unambiguously shows the closed position, irrespective of the rest position of the! Q7 b1 v5 w* P4 v- C
actuator.
# }2 X9 u1 [9 S/ DRefer to IEC 60947-1, Clause 7.1.6.1
( U7 ~4 ^+ z: ~6 R7 a% R' T& x% f( s' s! l' l* f x3 Q
* @& x. t8 K: N5 |- O" c, {2 q- Q* D8 B3 H( R6 a8 x/ d9 q$ s, ?7 B
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|