|
7 Z E% ?2 f/ h- l
$ K7 k: f" X( A+ B" v+ Q; { | Reduction of clearance and creepage distance
/ j( @" G; _$ u% n4 F* C | 54# C1 j4 D1 v( v$ T
| 60601-1(ed.2);am1;am2
" B4 \# U% g& k, G! J6 d | , B5 U. c4 y( `% F8 O/ ^* W8 A
7 s2 j) y. r; v; c6 @
Standard(s)- (year and edition):
8 d8 {6 Y9 x/ m/ |# q8 tIEC 60601-1:1988+A1 +A21 K9 o) B6 @$ ^! m3 a
Sub clause(s):
. y+ x# |+ i+ g6 S54
/ W% D7 r) E5 ?. N3 B: g ESheet n°: 535
2 w7 q3 Q# W# M6 ]# J! l% RSubject:' W( ]3 o* W/ U B0 F
Reduction of clearance and7 @3 p6 a9 _, i5 ]* {1 B
creepage distances
/ R# w7 R- K/ @' h* S" s5 }Key words:
! E: V$ i G, s" V# HClearance, creepage, reduction,0 u( d/ u+ _; R
tracking resistance! y$ i/ \, |( o9 H8 P
Decision taken at the 40th
4 F: | i- o4 R; ?! u+ _& Pmeeting 2003
" Q N" h z2 ?3 hQuestion:
/ j. Y/ J, k' t, |6 Q: HIs it permitted to reduce the creepage and clearance requirements of clause 57.10 based on evidence that
/ X1 o# {- m! P" F, j& Z% ], hthe material being assessed has a high resistivity to tracking?4 I+ N; F$ _6 d) D
If it is permitted, what IEC Publication should be used as a guideline in determining the permitted
. s: g+ @ Z6 b" k: qreduced creepage and clearance distances?
* [( _) T8 X5 h$ w: `, V6 J! XDecision:
1 A2 ?/ |8 B2 UThis edition of the standard does not allow reduction in clearance and creepage distance.
0 b0 N% Y/ d5 v( u! ?. X) A$ |( iExplanatory notes:
. a K9 `4 J: o- f* W/ R2 ]This problem will be transferred to SC62A/WG14 to make a recommendation to the 2nd edition do deal
: x# J" p$ J+ S e+ Iwith this issue. The 3rd edition will address this issue.5 K% ?0 L5 d' |9 ^2 u1 O
; o" ]% U2 E$ U9 B2 K- W' u- S' p7 Z& }
1 p. v) |# |, j8 f |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|