|
| DSH 597
8 T/ H3 N i5 M& W" I! G; n) g1 L' X
0 ]# B e4 u& V | Verificaton of main contact position, position of the actuator* D0 m# J) e, }$ K+ g
| 8.3.3.9
8 M! F+ f' [/ w. |7 ]6 U6 {) X | 60947-1(ed.1);am1 & 60947-1(ed.2) & 60947-1(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3) & 60947-1(ed.3);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3);am2 & 60947-1(ed.4) & 60947-1(ed.5) & 60947-1(ed.5);am1 & 60947-2(ed.1);am1 & 60947-2(ed.2) & 60947-2(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-2(ed.3) & 60947-2(ed.4) & 60947-2(ed.4);am1
! a0 {0 N- D, }0 k4 l |
& k0 \3 R M- M# X! g2 cStandard(s): IEC60947-1, IEC60947-
' y; I/ E( A* `5 i: X1 Q ? N2# p2 Q+ w% y* e4 ?; W/ a, r* T
Sub clause(s):
1 H$ g7 T/ w2 }) P7 ^6 X8.2.5.3 of IEC60947-1 and
0 L# K! S$ ~' P0 C8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-2
$ d" ]+ T' J) P! t( aDSH
7 F0 N" O* w5 M/ J597, D" h2 v3 q* \7 F9 j/ Y- K6 L
Subject:
+ r3 K) \6 J* W4 W. ~; ~" sVerification of main contact8 {# ~" R/ W8 L
position, position of the actuator+ x1 P( H/ j' v3 l0 w% S$ i
Key words:
6 {/ e' S$ ` {2 h) E- suitable for isolation, ]3 n- h6 L, } ]) y
- indication of contact
) Y+ {: }- V3 I! z- x! M% gposition
' T1 h3 W( V( V$ g$ @1 ?( ]; FDecision approved by5 D/ M- M4 F+ A& Y( d" W |
the 44th CTL Plenary u! I* y8 C/ D7 v; u; \
meeting 2007
3 m: Y; F0 g% A; ~8 E4 MQuestion:
% k$ { Z7 l" a* B' t4 WVerification of the main contact position is conducted only on products suitable for isolation. This is an
5 |- t) M3 F! [" Eadditional requirement to be verified.
7 I3 p2 e* O& n7 CQ1: After the 3F test, the actuator comes to rest in a position between the trip and open position (which is( J$ }: G& I6 @1 @/ U2 A5 d
neither consistent with the tripped nor with the open position markings as indicated on the product). Is this a
, K3 L/ y; W, A& v4 _5 ?* lpass when tested according 8.2.5.3 of IEC60947-1?
0 H0 G0 X, n( R' J3 S. HQ2: If the answer of Q1 is yes, is this in conflict with the general constructional requirements of 7.1.5? How
, \, K7 T0 B5 m2 x2 ~/ h, f0 S- S( \should section 7.1.6.1 (additional (constructional) requirements) be interpreted?
4 S# q6 u# x* v2 i2 O' SProposal:
1 Y0 j# d- `6 J$ lThere are two possibilities, depending on the features of the breaker:5 g6 a5 Q) Y& ~/ a6 v* p: S9 Y
1) The indicator is the actuator, and it is the only position indicator, or% ]/ m9 W/ N; r" B) o2 ]
2) There is an actuator that may show the operating position, but in addition there is a2 c/ j: H( u6 t I3 Z
separate position indicator.- Y" K' J2 i1 f
For construction per item 1, this result is not acceptable: l5 ~2 p0 T; h. ?- N1 C2 v
For construction per item 2, the result described is acceptable if the separate position
) _+ n+ o. [# L2 [2 S7 s; Sindicator unambiguously shows the closed position, irrespective of the rest position of the
# G1 O2 G6 n% P7 Kactuator.: i) U' ?( l6 ?& t+ x h1 I
Refer to IEC 60947-1, Clause 7.1.6.1. @( t6 j& L; y: ^: \: @9 g2 M
& X% N# y* ?/ h9 N8 S
2 z, u* d8 b1 d7 p: M9 F. b0 p- {/ b" q8 V- D+ N% ]9 [# U
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|