|
| DSH 436
( {4 c( }$ X2 D7 {- n- E
b7 L% M0 u1 z5 H* H; _4 F) N5 y' k | Verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity IDm
% ?8 A) s. V. G; }4 f! |2 r4 O. i | 9.11.2.3
# M0 n/ E+ A: H) M9 ] | 61008-1(ed.2)& Z l, ]- H9 G! B; x
|
$ d1 \7 ~% y5 _Standard:
! M! k( k& v1 G9 W( IIEC 61008-1 (1996-12)
0 V2 N- ]/ d1 D) r8 c* dSub clause:) M8 ?7 [( Q2 a, W4 F S. s
9.11.2.3
/ E/ o: I" a K# [. S$ QSheet No. 436' |- l. E0 _ J
Subject:
- z8 G8 }$ w+ J) b) Y2 d% rVerification of the rated residual
- c t: d" W, D! ^( l$ _making and breaking capacity IDm
1 a9 g( ?/ D6 G1 bKey words: Confirmed at 39th
# M" a! U, h W6 a4 N! L2 A ACTL Meeting" @5 l1 ~& y* }' \* e6 ^: b% j' \
Question:( l$ K5 f7 `5 ~0 `3 v
9.11.2.3 refers to the test conditions prescribed in 9.11.2.1 and states that the resistor R3 shall: ^$ `- l0 p* N* L8 V8 E
not be used.* a' x( ]! g( W( \* z8 L
9.11.2.1 require the test circuits according to figures 5 to 9 together with resistor R2 to be used." U' ~# J" K+ `4 I; ^! H) r
According to these figures, the following inconsistency appears:: Y. z& J. r3 F8 b7 P
For a single pole switch (with two current paths) normally rated for 230 V, the rated residual
* w' X2 b% S' m/ u- J$ Umaking and breaking capacity has to be tested at 230 V.3 W; k4 G1 {6 t( w: D+ y
For a two pole switch normally rated for 400 V, the rated residual making and breaking
; F% E6 d1 U2 w# N }8 P! Acapacity has to be tested at 400 V.+ E; K6 N9 g9 r4 w7 V
For a three pole switch normally rated for 400 V, the rated residual making and breaking
* ]% j5 b9 W0 L4 n6 f, q6 fcapacity has to be tested at 400 V.1 w1 y; e2 ^) Y$ u3 J, ]6 M9 d1 o, O
For a three pole switch with four current paths and for a four pole switch normally rated for
- N6 R' h1 i6 A$ j0 ~1 ]5 O/ x400 V, the rated residual making and breaking capacity has to be tested at 230 V.
8 {8 P: s" P5 f/ y. pDue to the fact that the purpose of this test is not to cover the special fault conditions in IT-systems,* v! C. J6 N- w. p+ [. f" `" j- s4 A
the test voltage for this verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity should be
- y5 P9 R T* V# O. j( |1 \. a6 _2 o" F230 V, independent of the number of poles, and the relevant figures should be corrected.5 U! t, y8 b# ]: U* M
Decision taken at the SC23E WG2 meeting in Nice, October 2001:
. S4 u. C; N( s. n7 d3 cExtract from the minutes IEC SC23E_WG2_006:
_! f( a9 O3 _# D0 y' F( P/ }SC23E_WG2_010 request from Austria to update 61008 clause 9.11.2.37 _) f- y" L ] H1 N1 p
The proposal made by Mr Bachl was considered justified and accepted. During the meeting
5 S2 W1 K4 E5 z, iWG2 decided that laboratories and certification bodies should be informed about this
) ]# u# ?6 H8 bimportant decision.
9 o& s% N- C' p3 [3 L$ nTherefore the following statement was drafted:
* W# J4 q7 p% ]8 ~2
3 x& \3 k0 j$ L! m# [: D4 ~) nDecision to be forwarded to CTL:3 P( Z. H: {3 M$ }+ Y2 N
IEC SC23E WG2 decided to correct the inconsistent test requirement in IEC 61008-1 (1996-12), subclause
! ^. R6 s' j1 _5 ?0 U) S9.11.2.3 and in IEC 61009-1 (1996-12), subclause 9.12.13 - Verification of the rated residual
2 K5 n9 e4 } h N+ k lmaking and breaking capacity IDm.- c6 A- n7 p/ E Y
The test voltage for this verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity should be the
% V7 a' U/ u0 F7 Rline to neutral voltage, independent of the number of poles of the RCCB or RCBO. This correction will5 Z& ]9 I2 }7 [( h+ j3 N, D
be included in the next amendment or revision of IEC 61008-1 and IEC 61009-1.
# k3 l5 w( U5 U! |The revised test circuit (fig. 7) proposed for the standard is attached.
& r0 ~& ~- O& u3 c$ x' e8 d
+ F8 i; _. h+ _" r9 b( |8 C# S5 c! M6 l; V( e8 T5 D- F
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|