|
|
I4 n* k h/ L3 c1 s3 Q1 `
/ g0 o0 w, ]: b3 ^( j: u" K | Comparative tracking Index
! s8 y3 t7 O1 _/ k1 T! i8 o5 D | Tables in Annex D! b7 r, C! o# T3 e
| 61010-1(ed.1);am1;am2) m# u, C$ f/ o& M
|
@* s' d' g8 r; u" q0 M7 b- r6 n' R
! |- G0 o6 l" `- c/ JStandard:0 V0 a- |8 N, g( N0 I
IEC 61010-1:1990 +A1:1992 + A28 m3 j% q8 g! w: o/ `
:19958 \# B$ s) b* W- y
Sub clause:
/ Z1 k0 j% m" W& U4 V' `Tables in Annex D( {, y: I( C2 q; ^- _5 @% A }8 L
Sheet n. 369
0 g% W1 E0 ?( T. ^- t! i% N. F+ GPage 1(1), D6 s" q# w6 z, Y# x
Subject:$ N! ]8 ~" U- M0 o- e" v" G
Comparative Tracking Index
! S7 h" x: b. J7 j% p/ hKey words:
8 x/ l: J8 d7 m% }* {; ~9 k+ o- CTI values8 D: N {) y W7 A8 y) V6 g
- Manufacturer’s claim% v! `/ ~0 n! z2 ~) M4 m4 M# g
Decision taken by1 \! z: \! f) E) l# h7 ^
ETF3 and confirmed: Z* w! L& f+ s' v. i% C4 O
by CTL at its 38th. J3 k: ]6 f. i9 P
meeting, in Toronto9 n! \: X. G' g# r k
Questions :1 g+ d9 b/ Y9 O2 T; c# c7 h. ?
1. Is the manufacturer's declaration regarding the CTI values acceptable by Test Houses? `/ a8 e4 ^1 P, V) k5 r: }9 A
2.Is a single test for the CTI value acceptable?
9 c' U" K0 v; }3 V; u3.Which CTI value is to be used when no value tested or declared, for example for PCB's?/ Z3 Z, r2 b2 n0 A5 n
Decision:6 g+ h- N- E* S
1. The manufacturer’s claim is not adequate and must be backed by an independent test
2 Y. }0 {% `, T# f$ b% V" Z0 ^. \report/certificate from a recognised test house.
; Q' G2 j) M, ]1 c5 @) ]2. No testing considered necessary if the material is approved and fit for purpose. However
4 ^3 q( m, H- w! B m2 d3 Wif not approved than single test is not acceptable.9 U `- r7 \- b5 w% F+ R
3. The least favourable value, for example CTI value of < 100.
0 A! R" w4 [4 C( U$ o3 i2 J* y- L/ U2 ~& W* H
- \0 s( |5 M& A o$ x. R8 p
; X; G R4 Z0 p5 w! K+ ~ |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看，没有帐号？注册安规
x
|
/2 
|关于安规|小黑屋|安规QQ群|Archiver|手机版|安规网
( 粤ICP13023453-10 ) 
窥视卡
雷达卡
发表于 2012-9-18 11:53
收藏
分享
好帖
鸡蛋
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
喧嚣卡
变色卡
抢沙发
千斤顶
显身卡