|
@, P3 G+ T* ^' a8 _) A3 w; P5 m
& S+ E& j9 e4 T( |& q
DSH 753" ?' J. w" |- g, K0 u- ]* d
|
| Capacitor discharge voltage measurement, b \* Q7 c7 _1 r, D
| 9.1.6 (IEC60065/2001) 6.10.3 (IEC61010-1/2001)
% F' y: U; h6 P4 t7 ]9 v | 61010-1(ed.2) & 60065(ed.7)
0 x% z. b' K3 e& V7 Q |
1 `7 g$ m+ V. g
: P' y( [, ^5 c3 x& o3 _: s7 m# C0 LStandard(s): No. Year
% _7 [" S1 ^3 pIEC60065/2001
- s* r) ?& ?% \ dIEC61010-1/2001, y- T+ W5 V5 a/ h- `4 |1 J+ |
2009 DSH 0753 TRON, MEASCategory:
2 N5 L- G6 r5 I% k7 J9.1.6Subclause(s): : U* y; [7 j) V2 w7 o+ U: K
6.10.3
X4 ^- Q. L; Y/ V, |Developed by:
8 m1 f- U8 I# p9 {WG4, ETF2, ETF3" f( k5 G: d& h, E4 h$ h4 E; p
Subject:1 f7 ~9 b/ c6 k! L3 m" z
Capacitor discharge
# C0 ~; M7 Y8 g& zvoltage measurement
4 a/ \+ x# l- Z5 L% u' g A0 WKey words:
0 j i' w( E6 T0 e6 E% d& k) D; V- Plug discharge
& D* s) F0 E, K# Q' U- Capacitor discharge
2 ~; N4 Y7 W6 s+ K- Shock hazard
. x; T9 u) V' z, E8 N t9 d( ?9 A& vApproved at the 47th CTL
' T% D4 t0 w6 y6 uPlenary Meeting, year 2010
/ F+ w4 V3 `: h, E }4 EQuestion:
4 {2 \/ O( V E A, F. V0 ? @The standards referenced include a test commonly referred to as a plug discharge or capacitor
" F8 C; B+ Y8 Xdischarge test that involves disconnecting the product under test from the mains and. n$ d" S- r1 c& D! C+ i: v
measuring the residual voltage across a capacitor(s) at a specified time. The intent in each of
% D3 S- h9 u K, J1 K hthe referenced standards is the same – measure the maximum voltage obtainable at the time
1 e/ r2 I- M9 o8 `2 S% Dspecified.
3 \5 }, i P r7 Q8 P' d(1) Each standard has a slightly different description of how the mains disconnect is made, but, X. ~6 M! T, k" t2 X/ }. E) }
the intent is to disconnect at the highest voltage possible in the AC power cycle. With the
# f3 x' D. d# r" k% Z7 Padvent of electronic voltage sensing switches, it is possible to disconnect at the peak voltage in
% N& ?/ I4 ~2 |5 \. p) G N/ lthe AC cycle. Using this procedure seems to be within the intent of the standards and would! a; a1 ?1 m' f- \- Y
result in more consistent and repeatable results. Is it acceptable to perform the test this way?
/ a3 E2 y% Q9 I* G4 |! I- a( w(2) Good laboratory practice dictates that the voltage should be measured with a high input, R& }- [$ y* P6 f/ @' {
impedance voltmeter. For this test, some standards require the use of a voltmeter with an input
5 E8 I8 d+ y6 E- r+ w8 J( A' Fresistance of 100 M 1 ± 5 M 1 in parallel with an input capacitance of 25 pF or less. For more
% S6 ~( }* ?8 a: [7 q- [/ @consistent and repeatable results should this type of meter always be used for this type of test?
. E. I' y0 Q' J, ~- {, h5 _$ ADecision:
7 M/ ]" ^3 f2 \7 G" c; m7 P(1) Yes, this method should always be used for these tests within the CB Scheme.
' y5 n$ A, Z- T4 j(2) Yes, a meter with the stated input impedance should always be used for these tests within: A. l9 s `# }& Z. j: z2 e
the CB Scheme.
" [( t' ^6 J* \% ^9 ]7 T7 ?* H5 w
' }- v; i: t5 p& S+ M0 q2 w8 b$ D$ g( O" F* L2 {% _
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|