|
| PDSH 854
; U1 ?# [! d& b9 v+ m6 a6 f4 e: P( A1 ~* a$ F
| Screw connections
' R4 Q+ `$ a6 j @ | 4.11.3
2 t* G) D, \) z/ W. y% C8 Y | 60598-1(ed.3);am1 & 60598-1(ed.4);am1 & 60598-1(ed.5) & 60598-1(ed.6);am1 & 60598-1(ed.7): q% w. m4 a$ V4 r/ F! F1 x
| ! j2 _9 z& M" d' j
Standard(s):
+ f F# L1 ~+ O- o" k; c; OIEC 60598-1 All editions4 G5 I# Y" c9 f H
Subclause(s): 4.11.30 p* V! d+ C, M9 Z$ @
No. Year PDSH 0854 2010
, I+ w4 o* C+ x# ?& Q7 f1 K a' y; UCategory: LITE Developed by: ETF5 OSM/LUM$ Z5 {2 U. Z% ]0 V
Subject:
1 f* B1 Q. B' `. }0 YScrew connections2 t9 x9 P( t/ r' a; B6 ~* |
Key words:+ l& u( i4 p+ ~' O
- Small “spikes”$ P2 S% O/ A* w6 q; o3 _5 a
- Locking of screw connections
6 }3 l5 [: M1 o9 X K- Ballast6 Y3 E4 {; B+ r, I2 u$ x9 J
To be approved at the 49th CTL Plenary Meeting, in 20121 c0 V. s5 c; @" y; n& {4 ]
Question:
) [2 w5 ~5 J9 ?2 j' gAre two small “spikes” for locking of screw connections of a ballast acceptable?
! |: s! w+ k- j6 R( HDecision:7 a4 _+ ?* I' t9 r$ f1 X; I
The solution is acceptable. Each case has to be judged on its own merits.+ O e4 Y% a* F9 p
# d/ e% z; [( Q8 ]/ V4 h
( X: ?8 t7 k$ z4 K, x. J
: r0 G+ H+ N4 W2 ?2 w- e6 \3 G; i* q8 X. Y/ L8 v
* j# d9 P* Q, W6 A% E
T7 N; f2 Z* ]. J: N4 ^# r8 W" ? |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|