|
| DSH 615
) K7 ]# E0 R' Z0 E/ m: L
4 y. O) E$ b- e: v& K | Abnormal operation" K! N) G% P5 P( s
| 19.11, 19.11.1 and 19.11.22 e9 g y5 z+ e4 w
| 60335-2-6(ed.5)* k. T6 B8 b& N( ]$ z
|
. h& D, ~; e8 ^( z) ]$ ~7 t6 ZQuestion:& i' o! k- |0 d( O5 S$ v6 a0 ]
According to the wording of cl 19.11 of part 2- 6, electronic circuits are checked by evaluation of the fault conditions specified in 19.11.2 for all circuits or parts of the circuits, unless they comply with the conditions specified in 19.11.1.& r% m9 k1 B9 H: w/ v
Some test houses are of the opinion that the fault conditions a.) to f.) specified in 19.11.2 are not applied to the controller of the hob elements, if the hob has an additional mechanical protector,
3 w* s, c3 k1 }" e% R* E/ BConsidering that the dangerous malfunctions of the switches of hob elements shall be tested according to the addition of cl. 19.11.2 of part 2- 6, shall sub-clause 19.11.2 is performed?
6 l: x% @; P* b T( G(In the most cases, the same switches of the hobs will be used for the "off-position" of the hob. The intention of the "Addition of cl. 19.11.2 part 2- 6" was to prevent a new "Toaster case").
% {* Q( @, ~8 X. TRationale: see question
O6 V8 U+ p8 j+ `5 V: E$ sProposal (if any):8 @* j, C* V8 g* V O* u* h
Even if there are no protective electronic circuits, the "off" electronic disconnection or the "stand by" mode shall be tested according to 19.11.4 and 19.11.2.# Q3 Q0 z4 v/ \. {- _& k- M
8 z: m. e' H, B; d; o& k" n% p
% T8 `: H+ [4 K |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|