|
| DSH 5881 E. M0 D' s5 X; z* z+ U
9 Z5 c6 k$ A A" Z | Verification of main contact position, position of the handle7 S B0 P% f- p% _# d7 I
| 8.2.5.3.2 of IEC60947-1 and 8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-2
4 g7 ^" W* G6 k/ N | 60947-1(ed.1);am1 & 60947-1(ed.2) & 60947-1(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3) & 60947-1(ed.3);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3);am2 & 60947-1(ed.4) & 60947-1(ed.5) & 60947-1(ed.5);am1 & 60947-2(ed.1);am1 & 60947-2(ed.2) & 60947-2(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-2(ed.3)
6 X6 Y8 E' r" r9 {- j8 f |
, {) C5 x. d/ I4 f1 T" f7 p! dStandard(s): IEC60947-1, IEC60947-
& I9 W2 v/ P3 T3 v: x2, IEC60947-3
' d* n( S( J0 [0 lSub clause(s):
8 [) }6 }$ N- k8.2.5.3.2 of IEC60947-1 and
; x0 G' ~0 O2 q% x8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-2- c. j P" d, _0 B. j+ q+ I
Sheet No.
E2 }, u( g$ F% U: kDSH 588
0 n# s2 K- z+ ^6 B) VSubject:
% r* [ G- E1 U( l2 zVerification of main contact+ i A) [$ ]) n1 |
position, position of the handle/ `7 O y7 n( D6 ~; j
Key words:
* ~4 ]9 H" T, J0 Z7 G- g7 \- suitable for isolation: }5 E# S" P* ^' ?9 ?( }: Y" @
- indication of contact. q: z1 G7 ] ]" |2 n; i
position
R* _' `# A0 a$ YDecision approved; B8 Z G1 ? j% O
during the CTL Plenary
% T, l" I, A) {. [3 wMeeting 2006
* P O; K. P/ W* a# q0 n' JQuestion:- y% g$ F2 D% M1 z
Verification of the main contact position is conducted only on products suitable for isolation. This is an9 t+ ]( M+ F# f0 z+ }0 W: S
additional requirement to be verified. With respect to this test, the following two questions gave rise to3 D$ B( A4 I) b, \% G1 \
discussions6 o p5 o8 a3 }) z+ V% l7 C2 m4 K
Q1: When after the 3F test, the indicator comes to rest in a position between the trip and open position (which
4 p; R1 T2 P0 Z4 l8 Yis not the tripped or open position as indicated on the product), is this a pass when tested according 8.2.5.3 of
$ C* o E' ]$ g3 ]; W+ m: iIEC60947-1?
" N# ~+ x4 t1 \, m$ `Q2: If the answer of Q1 is yes, is this in conflict with the general constructional requirements of 7.1.5 or how4 R. w$ x! n) K
should section 7.1.6.1 (additional constructional requirements) be interpreted?0 N& ~9 ]6 P" J' `4 V3 j: r+ c
Decision:5 F8 U# T9 Q' w" A- b: J1 s% h
There are two possibilities, depending on the features of the MCCB:
; ]! d8 t1 y/ ^" ?! }1) The indicator is the actuator, and it is the only position indicator, or8 D3 T1 i4 X- ?0 Y- x6 K7 v+ k
2) There is an actuator that may show the operating position, but in addition there is a
* U) r3 Y3 D7 h& F7 \, q- dseparate position indicator.
) m* n! A6 ~! g7 W" ?For construction per item 1, this result is not acceptable) x' R! K/ z3 a5 a. I" d; L
For construction per item 2, the result described is acceptable if the separate position
0 V0 x8 D0 }+ c/ c/ z/ c6 Aindicator unambiguously shows the closed position, irrespective of the position of the8 A' z( L( \. l e* e
actuator.8 A' n: Q: D6 N) |
Refer to IEC 60947-1, Clause 7.1.6.1
8 t5 _5 ?# E2 x% }4 N3 O! A' |/ f! ?- I
9 b7 d' b$ p& l1 t5 M
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|