|
| DSH 597
) j) h' f7 I2 ?& P# n$ K9 \, F! n) Q/ S/ E, O$ x# A3 z9 |
| Verificaton of main contact position, position of the actuator
. v$ a b5 n" o1 ^" N7 P; M | 8.3.3.9 f' j- @# G# ]/ B$ T
| 60947-1(ed.1);am1 & 60947-1(ed.2) & 60947-1(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3) & 60947-1(ed.3);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3);am2 & 60947-1(ed.4) & 60947-1(ed.5) & 60947-1(ed.5);am1 & 60947-2(ed.1);am1 & 60947-2(ed.2) & 60947-2(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-2(ed.3) & 60947-2(ed.4) & 60947-2(ed.4);am1 h( M4 g" g" @2 f, \+ P
|
. X/ G; W2 ?/ A( qStandard(s): IEC60947-1, IEC60947-0 m; Q A8 M* F- q/ o" }" @
2% F+ d I4 y2 @8 J. @ N
Sub clause(s):
& Q0 z: O/ W. ^9 e8.2.5.3 of IEC60947-1 and5 [' w8 @; n0 z) N
8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-2
$ Q) T. ^0 I: Q6 w8 d6 ]DSH: ?1 u, W( q9 h% v
597
8 ]8 L6 {& t* S6 v. T7 g$ _Subject:
7 c# P. r& }) e" L( UVerification of main contact6 ^/ L' o7 o' X1 D. q; Z: a- a
position, position of the actuator+ N S: |, r j! R
Key words:
+ M* N/ _: N# Z7 K- suitable for isolation. d5 q6 @8 q) ]) a1 z# ?
- indication of contact
7 _9 P+ x6 x! d/ J4 }position* C2 _) h9 r$ k5 k6 g
Decision approved by+ ^; x, X# w! E+ c4 v; c0 p, ^+ }
the 44th CTL Plenary- L9 h1 a$ u& ~$ ~% y/ h# S- s' `9 ?
meeting 2007
, n, K8 _( ^; I9 _3 N& RQuestion:
. H/ L$ U! `* P& I9 z$ t% q9 UVerification of the main contact position is conducted only on products suitable for isolation. This is an
+ u/ j4 V$ _& ]0 O) jadditional requirement to be verified.
/ C+ Q3 G$ k1 J) OQ1: After the 3F test, the actuator comes to rest in a position between the trip and open position (which is8 ~' w/ z& E! B5 m2 u
neither consistent with the tripped nor with the open position markings as indicated on the product). Is this a2 C0 ]$ _5 V$ O; u9 M; z
pass when tested according 8.2.5.3 of IEC60947-1?% }0 h3 i7 z9 n6 z! ]8 I# d
Q2: If the answer of Q1 is yes, is this in conflict with the general constructional requirements of 7.1.5? How
8 a$ u8 H% Z: t3 E. v: G/ fshould section 7.1.6.1 (additional (constructional) requirements) be interpreted?5 s1 }+ J2 z) q
Proposal:
! }1 T+ `1 r* Q W% M$ TThere are two possibilities, depending on the features of the breaker:
6 n4 r1 o" N O! R- W) S1) The indicator is the actuator, and it is the only position indicator, or
2 ?% p; ]' ^; ~: Z, d6 r4 {0 }2) There is an actuator that may show the operating position, but in addition there is a8 q9 }% x& p% ] m
separate position indicator.
3 r0 S# N# m0 k" J! BFor construction per item 1, this result is not acceptable4 |. n9 i* t( s5 ~: Z
For construction per item 2, the result described is acceptable if the separate position
: v; X/ r! d! Lindicator unambiguously shows the closed position, irrespective of the rest position of the
1 k8 m9 ~+ g0 v- W3 R) }( Xactuator.
_5 p* G5 w2 u+ [- z1 l$ gRefer to IEC 60947-1, Clause 7.1.6.1' l2 j7 v# Z2 n: i$ B
6 O$ A4 V/ a% D# }% ^ [1 ~ s2 @6 X7 q, Q
8 x9 [! e; _$ ~, r; ^5 a |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|