|
本帖最后由 清水白菜 于 2012-10-29 16:08 编辑
( ~+ E( O2 s' F# w
% N7 ~0 A1 ?* m! STest Name | Test Method | Units | Tested (mm) | Value | Flammability | ISO 9773, IEC 60695-11-10 | Class (color) | 0.08 | VTM-2 (NC) | | | | 0.13 | VTM-0 (NC, BK) | | | | 0.25 | VTM-0 (NC, BK) | | | | 0.51 | VTM-0 (NC, BK) | | | | 0.63 | V-0 (ALL) | | | | 3.0 | V-0 (ALL) |
Glow-Wire Flammability (GWFI) | IEC 60695-2-12 | C | - | - | Glow-Wire Ignition (GWIT) | IEC 60695-2-13 | C | - | - | IEC Comparative Tracking Index | IEC 60112 | Volts (Max) | - | - | IEC Ball Pressure | IEC 60695-10-2 | C | - | - | ISO Heat Deflection (1.80 MPa) | ISO 75-2 | C | - | - | ISO Tensile Strength | ISO 527-2 | MPa | - | - | ISO Flexural Strength | ISO 178 | MPa | - | - | ISO Tensile Impact | ISO 8256 | kJ/m2 | - | - | ISO Izod Impact | ISO 180 | kJ/m2 | - | - | ISO Charpy Impact | ISO 179-2 | kJ/m2 | - | - |
1 m; G$ b, ^% U! r+ B/ e, G
1 E' ]# b, @' D1 J2 _Test Name | Test Method | Units | Tested (mm) | Value | Flammability | IEC 60695-11-10, IEC 60695-11-20 | Class (color) | 0.75 | V-1 (BK) | | | | 1.5 | V-0 (BK) | | | | 2.5 | V-0, 5VA (BK) | | | | 3.0 | V-0, 5VA (BK |
Glow-Wire Flammability (GWFI) | IEC 60695-2-12 | C | - | - | Glow-Wire Ignition (GWIT) | IEC 60695-2-13 | C | - | - | IEC Comparative Tracking Index | IEC 60112 | Volts (Max) | - | - | IEC Ball Pressure | IEC 60695-10-2 | C | - | - | ISO Heat Deflection (1.80 MPa) | ISO 75-2 | C | - | - | ISO Tensile Strength | ISO 527-2 | MPa | - | - | ISO Flexural Strength | ISO 178 | MPa | - | - | ISO Tensile Impact | ISO 8256 | kJ/m2 | - | - | ISO Izod Impact | ISO 180 | kJ/m2 | - | - | ISO Charpy Impact | ISO 179-2 | kJ/m2 | - | - |
* b0 U! ^: ], o( P4 ~
! r8 \( P8 q/ U, c/ k( S以上可见Flammability这一项测试标准不一样,相关标准要求的厚度不一样;
# w, @' G: Q# a+ M60950-1里有说到Flammability可以等效互换(见加粗部分), 电气和机械强度方面要具体考虑。- B$ P( L5 Q Y% V
NOTE 1 When applying the requirements in this standard, HF-1 CLASS FOAMED MATERIAL is regarded as better than( r7 ~6 {8 f9 h8 E; F! |. q7 D* ?
HF-2 CLASS, and HF-2 CLASS better than HBF CLASS./ J: z/ j0 I8 l# @* ~& K( A
NOTE 2 Similarly, material of 5VA CLASS is regarded as better than 5VB CLASS, 5VB CLASS better than V-0 CLASS,3 N* m5 C$ K7 f1 J: L: h* e6 b
V-0 CLASS better than V-1 CLASS, V-1 CLASS better than V-2 CLASS, V-2 CLASS better than HB40 CLASS and
6 o) G6 ]4 f) w' Q# Q4 E2 wHB40 CLASS better than HB75 CLASS.
' F/ t' l5 N; f) n7 D9 }: s% P* VNOTE 3 Similarly, MATERIAL of VTM-0 CLASS is regarded as better than VTM-1 CLASS and VTM-1 CLASS better than$ _& v; L8 V/ Q; g* F2 ~
VTM-2 CLASS.8 R8 q* R q0 c2 I! p" i) V
NOTE 4 VTM-0 CLASS, VTM-1 CLASS and VTM-2 CLASS MATERIALS are considered to be equivalent to V-0 CLASS,
% i7 G0 X) U& K* W- v' D+ h; iV-1 CLASS and V-2 CLASS MATERIALS, respectively, but only for their flammability properties. Their electrical and' o: v( L O0 P; I7 \( s% a
mechanical properties are not necessarily equivalent.9 [1 k4 N5 t) g8 W$ f) [
NOTE 5 Certain flammability classes have replaced the classes used in earlier editions of this standard. The& S" X& y$ C5 {
equivalence of the old and the new classes is shown in Table 1B.
1 `! c& o; l" }- D |
|