|
| DSH 588: a' R: r5 C4 L$ p- D% c( r
: d/ P" I" B" w# h5 p9 n | Verification of main contact position, position of the handle" K. G- ^9 G# n4 p2 x: N, E
| 8.2.5.3.2 of IEC60947-1 and 8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-2) Q c+ ]% H8 E* L2 J6 @
| 60947-1(ed.1);am1 & 60947-1(ed.2) & 60947-1(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3) & 60947-1(ed.3);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3);am2 & 60947-1(ed.4) & 60947-1(ed.5) & 60947-1(ed.5);am1 & 60947-2(ed.1);am1 & 60947-2(ed.2) & 60947-2(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-2(ed.3). M+ U$ x, N6 C
|
) c' }% h: |" U3 h0 _Standard(s): IEC60947-1, IEC60947-6 z" N/ ?4 w7 E, M
2, IEC60947-31 d6 a! M# _$ g: ]$ i( y
Sub clause(s):
+ M, p, _" l1 \+ F- t( P( w8.2.5.3.2 of IEC60947-1 and
( o! X4 Q/ E' }- v8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-2+ m# b/ @1 f* L5 [8 F
Sheet No.
D! C4 a8 K- G6 oDSH 588
* p( M' b+ M/ ~( |# S5 }0 ~, }3 y. {Subject:/ k" l5 @/ y: P1 b$ y# [9 p3 ]4 P
Verification of main contact* c+ y; B" V* Q, {8 z
position, position of the handle
3 Y" l9 B+ }, u% Q* b$ b) \Key words:3 i; q+ y$ Y4 p6 v6 F2 [7 u
- suitable for isolation
2 S E& P& s) N" j: m- indication of contact
, @7 y$ t, Q hposition
8 V y: i1 W, s/ }. Q* s4 O1 ^Decision approved
h1 H; J6 ]; e) x7 }% ?during the CTL Plenary) k* W1 p" x: ^# Y0 q4 a
Meeting 2006
4 _+ E) [* S& r2 l$ [% CQuestion:
! w5 D: P# N7 CVerification of the main contact position is conducted only on products suitable for isolation. This is an1 `+ Y$ T$ O1 v0 Y
additional requirement to be verified. With respect to this test, the following two questions gave rise to
1 _" {* O1 `" V/ s- ydiscussions
& n& P3 `: U! _# Z ~% XQ1: When after the 3F test, the indicator comes to rest in a position between the trip and open position (which' U: u, U8 D$ F
is not the tripped or open position as indicated on the product), is this a pass when tested according 8.2.5.3 of
* m; v4 L V: E( M, E" MIEC60947-1?0 Z, n/ u# q$ `% w w6 X
Q2: If the answer of Q1 is yes, is this in conflict with the general constructional requirements of 7.1.5 or how
! S7 q" j$ }! Oshould section 7.1.6.1 (additional constructional requirements) be interpreted?* h4 L0 R- k% s, w+ A) y
Decision:2 y7 B1 z8 n a3 Y4 t( W+ G
There are two possibilities, depending on the features of the MCCB: @1 ?, q8 B. n+ Y4 W
1) The indicator is the actuator, and it is the only position indicator, or3 @- g" Z5 E1 N) s8 A$ [6 W# L
2) There is an actuator that may show the operating position, but in addition there is a( u! w4 x7 h, X; y- i
separate position indicator.
6 S% g6 J5 h8 W+ M; G) n: fFor construction per item 1, this result is not acceptable
& D# D- a4 z% a4 e7 RFor construction per item 2, the result described is acceptable if the separate position7 L r" V5 C1 v
indicator unambiguously shows the closed position, irrespective of the position of the! H. ?0 E) W) S0 ?3 I" Z6 ?
actuator.
" q9 [9 N( M! G9 }3 uRefer to IEC 60947-1, Clause 7.1.6.1
; Z$ R: F9 O I& n
8 H- z! b: m9 v- D! E4 p( _' Q0 I9 p V& l+ x) H/ h5 N5 [+ D
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|