|
本帖最后由 清水白菜 于 2012-10-29 16:08 编辑
* g+ q2 `/ w. V; j* s
6 e# I- q: A) w% UTest Name | Test Method | Units | Tested (mm) | Value | Flammability | ISO 9773, IEC 60695-11-10 | Class (color) | 0.08 | VTM-2 (NC) | | | | 0.13 | VTM-0 (NC, BK) | | | | 0.25 | VTM-0 (NC, BK) | | | | 0.51 | VTM-0 (NC, BK) | | | | 0.63 | V-0 (ALL) | | | | 3.0 | V-0 (ALL) |
Glow-Wire Flammability (GWFI) | IEC 60695-2-12 | C | - | - | Glow-Wire Ignition (GWIT) | IEC 60695-2-13 | C | - | - | IEC Comparative Tracking Index | IEC 60112 | Volts (Max) | - | - | IEC Ball Pressure | IEC 60695-10-2 | C | - | - | ISO Heat Deflection (1.80 MPa) | ISO 75-2 | C | - | - | ISO Tensile Strength | ISO 527-2 | MPa | - | - | ISO Flexural Strength | ISO 178 | MPa | - | - | ISO Tensile Impact | ISO 8256 | kJ/m2 | - | - | ISO Izod Impact | ISO 180 | kJ/m2 | - | - | ISO Charpy Impact | ISO 179-2 | kJ/m2 | - | - |
! X! t9 R3 P* g" F# l% @
7 @: [8 a" u* o: b( a$ t9 G4 jTest Name | Test Method | Units | Tested (mm) | Value | Flammability | IEC 60695-11-10, IEC 60695-11-20 | Class (color) | 0.75 | V-1 (BK) | | | | 1.5 | V-0 (BK) | | | | 2.5 | V-0, 5VA (BK) | | | | 3.0 | V-0, 5VA (BK |
Glow-Wire Flammability (GWFI) | IEC 60695-2-12 | C | - | - | Glow-Wire Ignition (GWIT) | IEC 60695-2-13 | C | - | - | IEC Comparative Tracking Index | IEC 60112 | Volts (Max) | - | - | IEC Ball Pressure | IEC 60695-10-2 | C | - | - | ISO Heat Deflection (1.80 MPa) | ISO 75-2 | C | - | - | ISO Tensile Strength | ISO 527-2 | MPa | - | - | ISO Flexural Strength | ISO 178 | MPa | - | - | ISO Tensile Impact | ISO 8256 | kJ/m2 | - | - | ISO Izod Impact | ISO 180 | kJ/m2 | - | - | ISO Charpy Impact | ISO 179-2 | kJ/m2 | - | - |
, |3 I0 q" [% M1 S2 N$ w1 J( T a" o6 V% o) P, E
以上可见Flammability这一项测试标准不一样,相关标准要求的厚度不一样;6 ?5 s% E. }2 f0 f, p1 z, _
60950-1里有说到Flammability可以等效互换(见加粗部分), 电气和机械强度方面要具体考虑。/ L( |* q/ M4 F" ^3 |0 T4 @" }4 }
NOTE 1 When applying the requirements in this standard, HF-1 CLASS FOAMED MATERIAL is regarded as better than* E9 N2 J8 y6 H. |9 ]
HF-2 CLASS, and HF-2 CLASS better than HBF CLASS.
6 h5 z) _+ ?( T; l. UNOTE 2 Similarly, material of 5VA CLASS is regarded as better than 5VB CLASS, 5VB CLASS better than V-0 CLASS,' s. L5 R% U/ j- ^
V-0 CLASS better than V-1 CLASS, V-1 CLASS better than V-2 CLASS, V-2 CLASS better than HB40 CLASS and
+ w0 Z; [+ R* _1 A! ~2 cHB40 CLASS better than HB75 CLASS.
( B# ]; J" M& ^1 p& p+ l9 M* _NOTE 3 Similarly, MATERIAL of VTM-0 CLASS is regarded as better than VTM-1 CLASS and VTM-1 CLASS better than
' q9 E) S( ^( y) V# gVTM-2 CLASS.
+ o1 d0 A3 }8 v U) a% x# Y: _2 WNOTE 4 VTM-0 CLASS, VTM-1 CLASS and VTM-2 CLASS MATERIALS are considered to be equivalent to V-0 CLASS,6 Z( Z: X( Y# |5 A3 @9 h3 G
V-1 CLASS and V-2 CLASS MATERIALS, respectively, but only for their flammability properties. Their electrical and
! g b2 k9 y3 V9 ]3 x; Z6 fmechanical properties are not necessarily equivalent.
0 P w1 |; K, T( o, n+ SNOTE 5 Certain flammability classes have replaced the classes used in earlier editions of this standard. The4 g; D5 Z$ b+ |9 s" [4 {. m2 R$ e
equivalence of the old and the new classes is shown in Table 1B.$ D# o' L+ P) b2 ?$ |
|
|