|
| DSH 252A
% h# [3 e# [, G3 ?) Y8 O
! j. P9 T* e/ y | Allowance of crimp connection for type M attachment
! n( y' |* e1 s | 2.2.10 and 26.12 a4 Y7 ^, A+ q" y
| 60335-1(ed.2)
% ~9 k- w4 c& b% }/ n! M' M |
# U$ E H( Q* gStandard: IEC 335-1, 2nd edition 6 R) l4 Q4 ]2 T5 S! j+ n( c/ r2 T
Sub clauses: 2.2.10 and 26.1
3 N" T- O5 v( d/ hSheet n. 252 A
. P- U8 K; W6 _$ y( @% wSubject: Allowance of crimp connection for type M attachment, h- `' x; s5 @% c0 Q) T( t
Key words:
; m! y' I2 Q! T2 S3 u# A1 ^- crimp connection
) o4 k' _" p) f- type M attachment: {2 B0 H; _/ f% _/ a
Decision 13 of 34th meeting/1997
3 g( j# e% p6 T3 ^/ t) R8 fQuestion: ^8 r* g! \, S3 C" ^; B3 h
Subclause 2.2.10 states that crimp connections are allowed for type M attachment,
* B" m; i3 i4 _- {and$ @% A( C2 o; C2 F( ~
subclause 26.1 specifies that “For appliance with type Y attachment or type Z5 } e8 n$ ~# H; P+ J! N
attachment, soldered, welded, crimped and similar connection may be used for the
8 e/ H3 |9 i; s6 i1 ^* p) Wconnection of external conductors”
: a. ~* F# Y1 HIs there any inconsistency between the two a.m. subclauses regarding the allowance6 X1 O& M' `9 C2 c" x( E1 G
of crimp connections in type M attachment?
2 V3 G e$ x; `5 g4 wAre crimp connections acceptable for type M attachment?5 p' C0 \( T5 A! H1 C8 i) P% E$ @4 r
Decision:( a" _" `: V% _ g
- There is no inconsistency between subclauses 2.2.10 and 26.1, as subclause 26.1
# E$ d- L8 w: ?& F l2 O' H8 W0 Trefers to types Y and Z attachments and not to type M attachment.
' E2 l$ e9 v3 E2 a+ n. R+ g% R- Crimp terminations forming part of a type M attachment are acceptable (see+ K& X5 y0 K9 ~- e7 v
sketch below).
: Z* [# t$ A% @; ]5 H( z$ Q
6 w) }& z j: D. ^( ?, M( W |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|