|
|
本人是做电池行业的，公司以前留有几份电池EMC检测报告，出自于ETS（倒闭换马甲了），现公司需要我对报告进行更新。
5 B2 @9 _/ ]9 r' X9 l我大概咨询了一下检测机构，一般都会说电池CE认证要做EMC，LVD由于电压不在要求范畴也不需要做，在网上找了一下，确实很多同行都将电池送去做EMC检测。只有香港SGS公司说电池是不需要做EMC的。" v# u1 ]3 K/ G& v! N
后来我在官方找了一下资料，2004/108/EC Art (9) page 1表示如下：
2 R" g# H# W5 t# p! T+ h! G
9 q7 |- D4 p" m5 Z& r1 HThis Directive need not regulate equipment which is inherently benign in terms of electromagnetic compat-ibility.1 `5 u8 O5 j* V+ ^! S' |" h! r
6 v* I l% k1 b- p5 J+ l
对于这个inherently benign 不是很了解，后又在guide of 2004/108/EC page 14中找到如下文：
G" a+ n4 C. [, r) v2 \1 H$ p! i7 c3 D* Q, U* V# U
1.1.4 Inherently benign equipment " D$ ]5 G/ l8 I* A8 I7 V: U
Equipment which is inherently benign in terms of electromagnetic 4 H9 t7 r# S) m$ z9 |' G, ^
25
V9 W; I# i& ?' kcompatibility is excluded from the scope of the EMC Directive . ]5 T$ A0 z' y% r7 S
Equipment is considered inherently benign in terms of electromagnetic
# E! F. h/ ?, `. X( o/ L, kcompatibility if:
& ~! S1 b+ K8 e Z8 W* G* its inherent physical characteristics are such that it is incapable of
& ~( Y8 }+ L8 D$ X; j; sgenerating or contributing to electromagnetic emissions which 4 R, Q9 A2 [2 M3 k4 \
exceed a level allowing radio and telecommunications equipment
) S8 I( x0 k, M: a* o3 l* h7 vand other equipment to operate as intended; and, ) [" t) P( k; q
* it will operate without unacceptable degradation in the presence of 2 d) `2 P6 ^3 S- U* G$ [
the electromagnetic disturbance normally present in its intended
. s& a8 f+ b5 ]+ i3 renvironment. % B" D1 P( X: q7 B: C& v) N
Both conditions need to be met in order to classify equipment as inherently 3 A: [: w/ I4 }" @% y* n2 H8 k
benign. & U9 S- q! u& ]+ e! y) m; i8 e* j( I
The application of the above enables the exclusion of the following
& R* w+ S# z8 y: W, U. _% P' Nequipment (not exclusive) from the application of the EMC Directive,
9 c( A8 z9 g! g. ~. _: g% `% c' Tprovided that they include no active electronic part(s):
) ]- B: p: r- d: U+ I26
% W) z! L1 l( L1 ?( f– Cables and cabling , cables accessories, considered separately;
5 o; W2 E$ s0 h. N% j% B– Equipment containing only resistive loads without any
- l* L; ~2 W: {' l( Q. n6 zautomatic switching device; e.g. simple domestic heaters with
& ?# ?9 c# @% R7 N7 o# |/ ?, J" Lno controls, thermostat, or fan; 2 o, J! c0 K8 t0 T3 D o3 T* v
– Batteries and accumulators (without active electronic circuits);
( a! x% x& V1 `! n& a# k' U– Headphones, loudspeakers without amplification;
& \6 X- Q/ b6 M– Pocket lamps without active electronic circuits.
. j) G' V2 A- _) d! Y8 d8 O5 T– Protection equipment which only produces transitory ( k( `6 H3 d( e, j
disturbances of short duration during the clearing of a short-
g6 x" x) g$ X! y) q/ I2 {% `6 w3 _" o
英文不是很好，但据我所知，从以上可以看到电池在(without active electronic circuits)的前提确实是不需要做CE EMC认证的，但为何检测机构却都说要做（骗钱？），而且同行很多也都去做那无意义、任何电池都能过的EMC认证？（骗中国消费者？）* d% M0 |3 g: i }" v& U
) |, a$ L) `! y& i3 T
请各位前辈能否详细解释下电池到底是否需要CE EMC认证？如果不需要，是否存在欧盟其他指令针对电池的（2006/66/EC及被其取代指令除外，这个一般都知道），如果没有的话，那电池是否不能印上CE标记？ |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看，没有帐号？注册安规
x
|
/2 
|关于安规|小黑屋|安规QQ群|Archiver|手机版|安规网
( 粤ICP13023453-10 ) 
窥视卡
雷达卡
发表于 2009-3-4 10:41
收藏
分享
好帖
鸡蛋
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
喧嚣卡
变色卡
抢沙发
千斤顶
显身卡
楼主
