|
| DSH 437
- @1 f4 C4 G8 P! ]$ ]5 p
4 x* K" f( P! _6 { | Verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity ID m
) H( z# y, A; b9 a% ?+ n& [ | 9.12.13
9 c4 @2 t7 |4 O* ~! P$ z | 61009-1(ed.2)
2 t$ p5 t- u& d; R |
/ w! s m& h0 OStandard:
1 Z; S) ^4 d: R2 m* R# B. jIEC 61009-1 (1996-12)/ B# k: M9 N2 ^
Sub clause:/ r: g, M, J/ Q* V0 P3 P' }
9.12.134 n& V* e: G, k
Sheet No. 437
8 k' a/ V4 W! F7 O4 L9 lSubject
. D0 y# C# }6 l" F1 j' W7 IVerification of the rated residual; @+ h: ^# s0 ^2 ]- L
making and breaking capacity IDm
9 O3 I' I- R+ c3 D9 s+ t% J8 V. qKey words: Confirmed at CTL
j1 n. v7 V- v5 j- B ^) T- c39th Meeting, w- A3 Q6 b" ~. k; K
Question:
. k0 b7 s' T) |: a' G6 }9.12.13.1 refers to the test conditions prescribed in 9.12.1 and states that the impedance Z1 shall
3 J+ U! l* @ O( I( S5 Mnot be used.$ {- e0 f, c& G4 J. v, m
9.12.1 refers to the conditions in 9.12.1 to 9.12.12.* o6 P E" h$ K+ K; O, D7 f$ ?
9.12.2 and 9.12.7.4 require the test circuits according to figures 5 to 9 together with impedance
" s3 ?, s- ^' S M% CZ2 to be used.
$ y1 G& f8 M+ x* g; }8 \/ O cAccording to these figures the following inconsistency appears:+ B$ ~: o `- k8 }) u
For a single pole switch (with two current paths) normally rated for 230 V, the rated residual
$ } D0 _$ f0 r; C* amaking and breaking capacity has to be tested at 230 V.
/ w! w8 w; j2 C6 `# J2 M: K8 ^For a two pole switch normally rated for 400 V, the rated residual making and breaking* t1 R0 S# J2 f- D7 H9 p
capacity has to be tested at 400 V.& D" z$ y" N1 i+ ]
For a three pole switch normally rated for 400 V, the rated residual making and breaking' b- U+ O4 U1 c9 O2 R6 M& x
capacity has to be tested at 400 V.0 h& P0 _# a( o' x8 q6 M. k
For a three pole switch with four current paths and for a four pole switch normally rated for E1 z# o9 n4 u3 n5 z
400 V, the rated residual making and breaking capacity has to be tested at 230 V.' \. s* [9 R8 [7 B- E# b" Q% u5 n% C8 Z1 [; }
Due to the fact that the purpose of this test is not to cover the special fault conditions in IT-systems,
g* h) ]( p5 lthe test voltage for this verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity should be
+ W) I; o5 V& l& e* f" C230 V, independent of the number of poles, and the relevant figures should be corrected.
1 u' t! E7 S9 X$ T8 O' f8 RDecision taken at the SC23E WG2 meeting in Nice, October 2001:" J+ g" O, i" y* ]1 Y: ~+ ]; o
Extract from the minutes IEC SC23E_WG2_006:5 D1 k# R0 }6 d4 T$ z
SC23E_WG2_010 request from Austria to update 61008 clause 9.11.2.3" T: N8 f$ y- `! ~
The proposal made by Mr Bachl was considered justified and accepted. During the meeting3 M3 D7 b' g2 `! a4 |% i' t
WG2 decided that laboratories and certification bodies should be informed about this
- `9 D! s& z. F/ R; B- simportant decision.2 A1 Y$ ^: ^& ^, d, P
Therefore the following statement was drafted:
2 u+ V* ^" F- ]! a" g" |5 ~21 a+ H0 y& }% e' q& e3 v+ F
Decision to be forwarded to CTL:
; x. M, t- }0 ?8 v* nIEC SC23E WG2 decided to correct the inconsistent test requirement in IEC 61008-1 (1996-12), subclause- Y% ^, A& o" f& v
9.11.2.3 and in IEC 61009-1 (1996-12), subclause 9.12.13 - Verification of the rated residual
: }+ @3 o4 Z4 ]) y1 d" Vmaking and breaking capacity IDm.
; O: A* o5 G) f) z; R; k) n5 n9 lThe test voltage for this verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity should be the, H2 r; U+ E" `2 ~, C
line to neutral voltage, independent of the number of poles of the RCCB or RCBO. This correction will
1 T+ o4 R# c) H8 i6 E2 tbe included in the next amendment or revision of IEC 61008-1 and IEC 61009-1.9 F$ {: p! d6 {: o7 \; ?
The revised test circuit (fig. 7) proposed for the standard is attached. q; Q! D3 e2 L5 m6 Z( x
, Q- f! g& x* s2 j) o% c
2 u* i, P' q- G) h& Z, c2 q- h |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|