V-O与VTM-0讨论

gadmei

广东安规检测
有限公司提供：

小型摆管淋雨试验机

IPX5X6X7喷水试验机

1000L恒温恒湿箱

各种试验指现货

可程式恒温恒湿试验箱

水平垂直燃烧机

自动卷线器试验机

耐划痕试验机

各种灯头量规现货

灼热丝试验机现货

GB1002插头量规

IPX1-X7淋雨现货

IEC61347/UL935镇流器热试验箱

灯具防风罩

IK冲击试验机

UL498插头插座量规

VDE0620插头插座量规

稳定性试验台

家电温升测试角

针焰试验机现货

热电偶焊机现货

家电125mm试验指

E12灯头量规

无绳壶无绳电熨斗插拔寿命试验机

IEC60335试验指甲

Dear All：
8 g0 t: \  A+ R# j& ?V-0和VTM-0材料除了厚度不同外，有什么区别，能否相互代替？
( R! |, e3 l- \

清水白菜

0 k0 T3 d& ^3 v# \7 A$ z

Test Name	Test Method	Units	Tested (mm)	Value
Flammability	ISO 9773, IEC 60695-11-10	Class (color)	0.08	VTM-2 (NC)
			0.13	VTM-0 (NC, BK)
			0.25	VTM-0 (NC, BK)
			0.51	VTM-0 (NC, BK)
			0.63	V-0 (ALL)
			3.0	V-0 (ALL)

Glow-Wire Flammability (GWFI)	IEC 60695-2-12	C	-	-
Glow-Wire Ignition (GWIT)	IEC 60695-2-13	C	-	-
IEC Comparative Tracking Index	IEC 60112	Volts (Max)	-	-
IEC Ball Pressure	IEC 60695-10-2	C	-	-
ISO Heat Deflection (1.80 MPa)	ISO 75-2	C	-	-
ISO Tensile Strength	ISO 527-2	MPa	-	-
ISO Flexural Strength	ISO 178	MPa	-	-
ISO Tensile Impact	ISO 8256	kJ/m2	-	-
ISO Izod Impact	ISO 180	kJ/m2	-	-
ISO Charpy Impact	ISO 179-2	kJ/m2	-	-

Test Name	Test Method	Units	Tested (mm)	Value
Flammability	IEC 60695-11-10, IEC 60695-11-20	Class (color)	0.75	V-1 (BK)
			1.5	V-0 (BK)
			2.5	V-0, 5VA (BK)
			3.0	V-0, 5VA (BK

Glow-Wire Flammability (GWFI)	IEC 60695-2-12	C	-	-
Glow-Wire Ignition (GWIT)	IEC 60695-2-13	C	-	-
IEC Comparative Tracking Index	IEC 60112	Volts (Max)	-	-
IEC Ball Pressure	IEC 60695-10-2	C	-	-
ISO Heat Deflection (1.80 MPa)	ISO 75-2	C	-	-
ISO Tensile Strength	ISO 527-2	MPa	-	-
ISO Flexural Strength	ISO 178	MPa	-	-
ISO Tensile Impact	ISO 8256	kJ/m2	-	-
ISO Izod Impact	ISO 180	kJ/m2	-	-
ISO Charpy Impact	ISO 179-2	kJ/m2	-	-

以上可见Flammability这一项测试标准不一样，相关标准要求的厚度不一样；
9 u* _7 h8 g( @4 D  {. k! o3 U$ F60950-1里有说到Flammability可以等效互换（见加粗部分）, 电气和机械强度方面要具体考虑。
& k9 A7 k# ]' M! y) @8 u' `, QNOTE 1 When applying the requirements in this standard, HF-1 CLASS FOAMED MATERIAL is regarded as better than
HF-2 CLASS, and HF-2 CLASS better than HBF CLASS.
NOTE 2 Similarly, material of 5VA CLASS is regarded as better than 5VB CLASS, 5VB CLASS better than V-0 CLASS,
V-0 CLASS better than V-1 CLASS, V-1 CLASS better than V-2 CLASS, V-2 CLASS better than HB40 CLASS and
HB40 CLASS better than HB75 CLASS.
NOTE 3 Similarly, MATERIAL of VTM-0 CLASS is regarded as better than VTM-1 CLASS and VTM-1 CLASS better than
VTM-2 CLASS.
4 y1 n1 {1 `5 y$ kNOTE 4 VTM-0 CLASS, VTM-1 CLASS and VTM-2 CLASS MATERIALS are considered to be equivalent to V-0 CLASS,
1 C& e' k! Z7 N' y: ?V-1 CLASS and V-2 CLASS MATERIALS, respectively, but only for their flammability properties. Their electrical and
- m, ^7 _6 Z5 O" E. p7 P' qmechanical properties are not necessarily equivalent.
' d" y/ L: U% b& r- V: ^, K6 |NOTE 5 Certain flammability classes have replaced the classes used in earlier editions of this standard. The
/ y3 ^  _0 y) j+ eequivalence of the old and the new classes is shown in Table 1B.
' P, F/ r- J% v2 \; |

gadmei

清水白菜 发表于 2012-10-29 16:03
以上可见Flammability这一项测试标准不一样，相关标准要求的厚度不一样；
60950-1里有说到Flammab ...

) _9 o8 I# A/ ~4 k! k, n谢谢LZ，很详细