|
S7 v7 F9 x; `! K5 M. d& t
- u3 r% R/ C# d/ R | Identification M/ \# e: x, Z! y: E
| 5.1.2
* U* W0 R! {8 ^3 }5 v | 61010-1(ed.1);am1;am2
3 b, P- V9 ~; F" Z, Y" D | 5 z: h M! y" Z& p& T, J6 P- a( T
* w7 y9 {2 R% M' W* _
Standard:
/ v+ l, z O; }: b/ p; ]( WIEC 61010-1:1990 +A1:1992 + A2: s) d: c2 x0 U. S4 y
:19950 ~& u1 t [* Q$ P U- A8 t$ |
Sub clause:- O9 _ N% ~* t5 a0 p9 J& z
5.1.2' X) i2 @( T0 m2 V, A
Sheet n. 362% X% B, ]1 F9 \, P- R/ G, F, M7 Q+ I0 X
Page 1(1)% U! e6 G$ r# S! M+ d
Subject:4 `' Q* W# h% q. x
Identification
9 u2 M) k! C8 F* m8 k5 BKey words:
j/ S& T; Y+ V) H- Manufacturer’s name
" o7 Q) ~5 j" h, E! _& L- Trade mark
0 K" Q8 m3 K2 ^& U3 [4 X, P- Agent/Supplier
3 V. P* \" d4 [! n" wDecision taken by
% V) _# T+ R! Y% i" f" j" nETF3 and confirmed& ?" T; L7 k- ?$ E- b1 M, k; }
by CTL at its 38th+ A8 |, n6 D$ g3 z0 x, y Z: S' \
meeting, in Toronto+ Q# D/ A5 O' d! P9 m
Question:2 Q$ j9 S& @0 ^3 E. ?+ Z2 C
Manufacturer's name or registered trade mark. Is manufacturer's agent/supplier name1 x5 I: `* w$ T5 ]% |3 f- B7 s3 c
acceptable as an alternative for identification?# R% I" }7 _5 _! }% C3 v0 l
Decision:
2 l- f8 m( N& T7 l1 D" KIn the absence of a definition for “manufacturer” in IEC61010-1, it was decided that only+ p0 i. A: d( \4 D& z
manufacturer’s name is acceptable under this sub-clause., b/ Q2 R) o1 G! D6 h
! A. _ x. g' K3 x5 B
( [; i5 ?* F( ~9 S3 R2 u) R- u! Y- x4 q' z @) J
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|