|
| PDSH 854
5 Z9 O0 \% @+ d7 G4 W' V
. }2 T! ~2 S9 O) b$ S | Screw connections
, D: K* T% a* V! B0 V | 4.11.3
# ^* x. X0 `+ f% I A4 f/ Q | 60598-1(ed.3);am1 & 60598-1(ed.4);am1 & 60598-1(ed.5) & 60598-1(ed.6);am1 & 60598-1(ed.7)$ [0 L' V7 B( g0 i+ g6 a
|
0 v1 o* l+ f" @' z9 D5 m LStandard(s):* j4 ~% v) G* _& Q
IEC 60598-1 All editions
5 M9 A' X) t( _3 u: eSubclause(s): 4.11.3
9 ?" J1 Z, o/ \" |2 Z% u( `No. Year PDSH 0854 2010
" ?' O0 k( ?4 l3 E$ ^Category: LITE Developed by: ETF5 OSM/LUM7 d) V8 z0 s- x& T0 s1 K
Subject:
% Y2 a7 ~7 n/ U, j9 d$ X% VScrew connections
8 ~0 x0 h6 Z- k/ SKey words:
/ J. p) p1 s: X/ N$ V/ f- Small “spikes”
$ E8 @+ O8 Z% D5 R3 N- Locking of screw connections( w5 N4 B, B1 E4 P6 s3 Y
- Ballast0 P4 Q/ K, P, P6 r; O4 P
To be approved at the 49th CTL Plenary Meeting, in 2012
. \0 n; ]7 J: _" H) ?8 H+ BQuestion:
3 u: Y& l+ m9 C5 ]( e& A+ bAre two small “spikes” for locking of screw connections of a ballast acceptable?
/ v: m7 w. `0 u J3 `0 BDecision: z( r' E6 y5 @+ C& n( i2 x2 S
The solution is acceptable. Each case has to be judged on its own merits.* {4 N2 z+ a6 M) A+ f1 r' `
4 d( ?% S" j4 R1 x* l% n6 f
) g( Y8 F4 O, d1 `; s; s
3 _( Y Z' z$ x8 o% [" ^7 Q3 z$ `* O$ P4 B: ]9 I
3 Q8 w8 t' J* t9 c7 {( O
9 z9 _8 }/ u) Z- u) ?8 e |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|