|
| DSH 437
- Z+ a' P( @3 l- R" Q; |/ e4 k: G) S# V! W
| Verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity ID m
% W9 s& Z& k6 D/ A0 @' ?+ G/ ? | 9.12.13) N% f5 a+ ~" p" ]3 ^
| 61009-1(ed.2)
% m, |# `# G( Q$ \) m, s |
4 a- T }; y# M+ O4 [Standard:
" N+ q% w a- j; TIEC 61009-1 (1996-12)/ A$ d1 t' K4 x. C7 C' m
Sub clause:
/ r1 F9 t, R' c9.12.13
2 u1 W1 D; t \9 wSheet No. 437
8 Q3 F# t7 x+ N/ J3 i* w; G: sSubject
% ^' D9 N! U8 lVerification of the rated residual
+ }, D% F q1 a' C0 m3 ?making and breaking capacity IDm
5 ^( B& S: f' N3 QKey words: Confirmed at CTL( ~8 G, t4 \/ E% t/ {
39th Meeting1 x4 x# Q3 W+ c) f5 T
Question:, h, M9 ]( W& j2 \
9.12.13.1 refers to the test conditions prescribed in 9.12.1 and states that the impedance Z1 shall/ z- K/ {0 c; w8 ~+ _* I" s5 w" z
not be used.( B. s3 h+ x7 A* I
9.12.1 refers to the conditions in 9.12.1 to 9.12.12.- i. ?- C* r( N- E- f( Q
9.12.2 and 9.12.7.4 require the test circuits according to figures 5 to 9 together with impedance1 [) ]5 u0 h* B2 R
Z2 to be used.
9 v- H8 u# S. b+ q/ w, `+ |- l6 iAccording to these figures the following inconsistency appears:6 g3 j" A! n1 _& ^+ R: ~3 F0 C2 u
For a single pole switch (with two current paths) normally rated for 230 V, the rated residual+ V) r4 ^8 P( Y8 l r$ M
making and breaking capacity has to be tested at 230 V.
0 k( J4 l4 o2 \4 OFor a two pole switch normally rated for 400 V, the rated residual making and breaking
* j1 Q4 s ^" X5 `- g) W6 ucapacity has to be tested at 400 V.7 ^, w9 S3 u' b- g0 n
For a three pole switch normally rated for 400 V, the rated residual making and breaking
. Y4 H; e Z. _" }1 N7 T, C9 ]capacity has to be tested at 400 V.3 `9 T9 M' P! Y, b% B( A1 ^
For a three pole switch with four current paths and for a four pole switch normally rated for4 k; V% ?4 i1 T9 G2 r! {1 D' U
400 V, the rated residual making and breaking capacity has to be tested at 230 V.( `: |2 N/ S6 ~" I& x
Due to the fact that the purpose of this test is not to cover the special fault conditions in IT-systems,
) F- m5 D' ` i8 C0 B" V/ Lthe test voltage for this verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity should be* b( @. M L- H/ R: i9 Y% Y5 R
230 V, independent of the number of poles, and the relevant figures should be corrected.
3 V, e. ], q* G& fDecision taken at the SC23E WG2 meeting in Nice, October 2001:" ?/ t2 Y5 E1 q D- g
Extract from the minutes IEC SC23E_WG2_006:
" b: D5 |- v6 ^. b" \* ^SC23E_WG2_010 request from Austria to update 61008 clause 9.11.2.3. e3 e- I2 }" [& q8 X$ j
The proposal made by Mr Bachl was considered justified and accepted. During the meeting
/ ~/ g, q5 f% l+ iWG2 decided that laboratories and certification bodies should be informed about this6 ^$ T3 {+ z1 A- F" Y3 U
important decision.: z$ Z2 A0 o$ @
Therefore the following statement was drafted:) L: E$ y; L# c% a, Q
2
1 k6 R2 @+ V) p) c2 XDecision to be forwarded to CTL:/ e. U5 p/ H& f
IEC SC23E WG2 decided to correct the inconsistent test requirement in IEC 61008-1 (1996-12), subclause$ E' I; l0 O9 r+ C
9.11.2.3 and in IEC 61009-1 (1996-12), subclause 9.12.13 - Verification of the rated residual4 Y7 i* M2 U( Y/ [+ }1 a, i
making and breaking capacity IDm. c2 ^. ~" G% f$ `; \8 Z! x
The test voltage for this verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity should be the" m2 z* d) @! o8 ?$ a' Z; X) o3 t
line to neutral voltage, independent of the number of poles of the RCCB or RCBO. This correction will
* y5 L5 o8 c% U/ g" j$ vbe included in the next amendment or revision of IEC 61008-1 and IEC 61009-1.
6 Z# @* _/ R7 g5 wThe revised test circuit (fig. 7) proposed for the standard is attached.
. F1 e. w; i. {8 M6 S# q2 D* K! c+ F* |' m; v7 o7 b
& t: L4 H! _* Y, T% J
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|