安规网

标题: 请问手持充电式电链锯应判为几类器具? [打印本页]

作者: seasunsky    时间: 2007-6-5 13:22
标题: 请问手持充电式电链锯应判为几类器具?
rt
7 U3 b! r( {3 ]$ S& w1 htks
作者: seasunsky    时间: 2007-6-5 14:29
引用第0楼seasunsky于2007-06-05 13:22发表的 请问手持充电式电链锯应判为几类器具? :
/ U* w+ |# P+ m. }$ I8 Q! F: Drt
' N/ S% T- v( A4 f. B, F8 _1 K' Itks
此帖不用回了
9 i+ w9 [, R( S3 {1 T1 mIEC 60745-1:2006版附录K中已规定不属于I类、II类、III类中的任何一类
# K- d$ G5 K: T. k[s:14]
作者: fasten    时间: 2007-6-5 16:05
引用第1楼seasunsky于2007-06-05 14:29发表的  :' a' C$ w" u1 F& r0 m
+ O5 ~" Q( a" `* J+ j5 I- Z8 i
此帖不用回了
0 t2 [8 q  L* D* `+ D7 _  XIEC 60745-1:2006版附录K中已规定不属于I类、II类、III类中的任何一类
" ?6 C0 z7 }3 W' U/ R[s:14]

6 H1 R6 e( d' x, K又出2006了?
作者: zhh0815    时间: 2007-6-5 17:22
电链锯应该是园林工具吧
作者: fasten    时间: 2007-6-5 17:23
引用第3楼zhh0815于2007-06-05 17:22发表的  :: ]" t$ Y- @5 I9 ^
电链锯应该是园林工具吧
4 H' x" i# D4 p/ |" x. L
是, 但確實是745的標準
作者: LEAD-SWB    时间: 2007-6-5 17:35
iec60745-2-13:2006   chain saw
作者: seasunsky    时间: 2007-6-5 23:11
引用第2楼fasten于2007-06-05 16:05发表的  :
! s  Z5 |2 a' Z+ U9 v$ N/ u( B8 b2 D+ r7 y, d3 {. {
" M7 N. w5 T7 H8 t" p
又出2006了?
早出了
作者: fasten    时间: 2007-6-7 12:59
引用第1楼seasunsky于2007-06-05 14:29发表的  :$ m  I/ R+ r0 v1 c1 C0 O  U
  z5 a1 L/ U2 {7 f5 R) i2 @
此帖不用回了; K& ?6 a  S0 j
IEC 60745-1:2006版附录K中已规定不属于I类、II类、III类中的任何一类$ x9 w5 H7 C$ d( n
[s:14]
  e$ J. t4 \+ J9 k8 ~3 T
能否給該標準查查? thx
作者: fasten    时间: 2007-6-7 13:46

4 G( |% o, i& h% S0 mK.1 Scope9 c7 w6 y$ k* u6 f  }( n) X9 l
This annex applies to rechargeable battery-powered motor-operated or magnetically driven
8 U( C+ k3 }$ Ftools and the battery packs for such tools. This annex applies to tools incorporating detachable,( B* y" y$ B( x# w! N! E
integral and separable battery packs. The maximum rated voltage for tools and battery packs is5 `: p/ o' R7 x3 }
75 V d.c., g' g" a, D* x
Battery tools covered by this annex are not considered to be class I, class II, or class III tools
7 e- L9 k1 |9 \3 xand therefore are not required to have basic, supplementary or reinforced insulation. Electric
- {2 L+ o0 |. }( @shock hazard is considered to exist only between parts of opposite polarity.# N& D0 y. T" [' f( Y3 J6 H( g1 g
Battery packs for tools covered under this annex intended to be charged by a non-isolated
& s& ^  M+ A" f: Y% I1 Fcharger shall be evaluated by this annex and standard. When evaluating a battery pack for
0 Z6 m# N! i; R& b& Y1 iprotection against electric shock, creepage distances, clearances and distances through
" ~6 R) ~# }7 p. p& C4 @insulation, the battery pack shall be fitted to the intended charger.
# |* k! d3 a/ qAll clauses of this standard apply unless otherwise specified in this annex. If a clause is stated1 L+ {. I/ }9 O/ b. }" K4 b
in the annex, the requirements replace the requirements of the standard.
0 Z4 W6 P5 ]6 c5 n6 BFor the purpose of the tools covered by this annex, the term “mains switch” as it appears in the4 {1 c, D( G8 c4 }, L% t
standard is understood to refer to the power switch of the battery-operated tool.
7 ]" x3 [+ w+ Z& oThis annex is not intended to apply to tools using general purpose batteries installed by the" E! t7 T2 i; ^' g. H
user, and this annex alone will not be sufficient to ensure all hazards are considered for these$ g+ X2 |7 p5 |  H% o
products’ “battery packs” .1 N- h$ |  ]' S7 A" b, ?' h
This annex does not apply to battery chargers which are covered by IEC 60335-2-29.
5 n9 ~6 p+ L- _; [; o4 S* y- ^
都來看看, 尚有疑問, 有時間再談!
作者: LEAD-SWB    时间: 2007-6-8 16:56
请问fasten有何疑问
作者: barry    时间: 2007-6-9 11:52
引用第9楼LEAD-SWB于2007-06-08 16:56发表的  :
! c, p  f* Q. f2 F" g请问fasten有何疑问

) Q) H* E% N6 T8 K1 t! z他的意思是说,如果大家看了他的贴子仍有疑问,他等会再来详谈。。。! {) \& _8 ]. }- n, f- w, F5 l

6 I" A6 G. L# ~' W& g你理解错了,不是fasten有疑问。
作者: fasten    时间: 2007-6-9 12:13
引用第10楼barry于2007-06-09 11:52发表的  :
+ U' M" ^7 A! ]. w
2 \5 b, g0 x# `0 P  g/ H# |  E% g, Z
% D5 S1 M- l1 o( A  m3 Z4 i他的意思是说,如果大家看了他的贴子仍有疑问,他等会再来详谈。。。
# r# F; }) B5 m( T3 N1 N: Z( e0 q. [  S9 u$ U+ u4 ?4 z9 r" a
你理解错了,不是fasten有疑问。
/ P4 W& R9 A! s2 k" |8 M2 a: s, X, c" S" R
确实是有疑问:; n  D9 b0 e7 |0 v  d4 {6 }6 \

: _& G% H& M. D% p8 Y) G5 [) M

  E' {1 O+ J  V' L/ ?- k3 {Battery packs for tools covered under this annex intended to be charged by a non-isolated$ `+ C2 |; S" _" P% b5 d7 }8 X9 T# ~
charger
shall be evaluated by this annex and standard.
$ {3 f1 g2 D' @: ~2 g4 |* B' B
此附录个人认为是把充电器不考虑来说的,如上面这段的潜台词!
作者: LEAD-SWB    时间: 2007-6-9 16:12
对,充电式工具工作时,应不再充电。
作者: LEAD-SWB    时间: 2007-6-9 16:16
When evaluating a battery pack for protection against electric shock, creepage distances, clearances and distances through insulation, the battery pack shall be fitted to the intended charger。如何理解?
作者: jsh863csh    时间: 2007-6-23 11:56
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
作者: LEAD-SWB    时间: 2007-6-25 16:24
Battery tools covered by this annex are not considered to be class I, class II, or class III tools
6 W( d+ ?7 k6 U1 Y% ^( [and therefore are not required to have basic, supplementary or reinforced insulation. Electric
% l" j2 m5 T, j+ q4 R$ tshock hazard is considered to exist only between parts of opposite polarity.
作者: franco    时间: 2007-6-27 23:35
引用第11楼fasten于2007-06-09 12:13发表的  :: U/ h* t; A# O2 n/ o+ J* j8 z

' Q: }; z7 @6 A9 N% C) Y) `2 b' q
2 O5 M$ L% ^" H- \# ]此附录个人认为是把充电器不考虑来说的,如上面这段的潜台词!
This annex does not apply to battery chargers which are covered by IEC 60335-2-29.
3 I# ^% G; [& N$ [# Y这句话已经说得很明白了,正如你所说,不考虑充电器.
作者: franco    时间: 2007-6-27 23:39
引用第13楼LEAD-SWB于2007-06-09 16:16发表的  :
; \5 G+ y  I. g) K( _9 S/ aWhen evaluating a battery pack for protection against electric shock, creepage distances, clearances and distances through insulation, the battery pack shall be fitted to the intended charger。如何理解?
这句话的意思很明白呀!- ?  ~2 Q# C9 L6 x
就是说,在考核电池包的爬电距离,电器间隙和穿通距离时,必须在电池包插在充电器上时的状态来考虑!
作者: 灵猎手    时间: 2007-7-3 13:08
看你的产品电源线插头是三岔还是两岔,三岔就是一类,两岔就二类,绝对没有三类的。
作者: sam-yang    时间: 2007-7-14 15:35
真够乱的 充电式工具不属于一二三中任何一类
作者: jim_zhang    时间: 2007-8-2 14:27
充电式工具的爬电距离即是不同极性零件之间的距离,靠量的时候需要插在充电器上面吗?
作者: allen2008    时间: 2007-9-18 22:14
这个问题是否由谁来总结一下,否则给偶等菜鸟看的话,会觉得太乱了。云里雾里的。   [s:5]
作者: screw2000    时间: 2007-11-20 22:05
如果标准是EN 50144-2-13, 那么算 III类  ,如果是按照iec60745-2-13:2006  (欧洲标准EN 60745-2-13)好象还没有出来, 那么算电池式工具, 不属于I,II,III中任一类,60745-1 附录K 中有说明, (个人认为,可以往III靠,没人会具体追究你究竟把他说成是III类还是电池式工具) 当然实际测试和理解按照标准来, 按照附录K, 有些方面它的要求有时候比III 还要松些
作者: tigersun    时间: 2007-11-28 13:13
如果是充电器直接带动工具,则工具应该考虑为三类器具。' h' ]$ }( G" c$ ]2 g6 p0 v
如果不能直接带动,一般都设计成插入充电器后电路断开,则应该属于Annex K里面说的器具。
作者: yuanhaijie    时间: 2007-12-2 21:18
iec60745-2-13:2006  chain saw谁有,能上传吗




欢迎光临 安规网 (http://bbs2.angui.org/) Powered by Discuz! X3.2