标题: 关于2009/48/EC 玩具定义的问题 [打印本页] 作者: winnie.zt 时间: 2010-12-28 15:08 标题: 关于2009/48/EC 玩具定义的问题 2009/48/EC公布好久了，大家有看到关于它里面玩具定义修改后的guideline吗，大家都认为玩具定义修改后范围扩大了，到底扩大到什么范围呢，2009/48/EC的解释里面讲的也很模糊，现引用解释如下： + Q! |1 [$ K' d" _6 xThis Directive shall apply to products designed or intended, whether or not exclusively,) Y1 {% d6 W( n: q' q# z% F
for use in play by children under 14 years of age (hereinafter referred to as "toys").9 }# t" r$ t3 p) h4 Z
Article 2 (1) defines the scope of the Directive, that is the products to which it applies.0 P- ^" e1 w) m5 g$ a
The definition in article 2 (1), first subparagraph, provides the following criteria for 5 e. o* J& \, L* `" ddeciding whether a product falls under the scope of the Directive: ' R4 t( l! p+ [, }1 y# Z Any product or material designed or intended 2 N/ t8 H* s b- [ whether or not exclusively' q6 o9 E; W4 }$ f+ ^( k$ K
for use in play . V* L+ Z+ m3 Z: v4 Q by children under 14 years of age. ) X: M$ X7 C, P6 D+ Z9 @The wording of this provision is slightly different than the definition in the 88/378/EEC % ?! Y) T$ q) X. ~Directive. However, the intention has only been to codify the practise under that & V, X6 b! m+ I1 ZDirective, and not to change the material scope of the Directive from what it has been up $ |5 L, |7 ^- f" w$ rtill now. The words “whether or not exclusively” have been added to the definition to% S! K% p7 O4 n$ N, m1 E
indicate that the product does not have to be exclusively intended for playing purposes in , C9 S& {2 K2 f- @' j( Porder for it to be considered as a toy, but it can have other functions as well. For / o3 i9 K$ {( R) r1 eexample, a key-ring with a teddy bear attached to it is considered as a toy, or a sleeping . p8 U6 |! c1 nbag in the shape of a soft filled toy. It was not the intention to imply that the standard for 5 @! v3 M* b+ y4 h* Otrampolines for instance needs to take into account adults using the toy-trampoline. Other % R5 A! n# @: M/ _6 u+ ]6 nexamples of products with double function (door decorations, soft filled animal shaped ( r0 G& Q; U. A7 g& M% Mpurses or backpacks,…) can be found in guidance document 11 on classification of toys) A' v7 P1 i4 [
intended for children above or under 36 months.; N$ c8 X Q& L: }) b$ T
个人认为上面几款算玩具，行李牌比较可爱小孩子可能会玩；眼镜吸管很新奇，小孩子也会去玩。大家认为呢？作者: wangjb 时间: 2010-12-28 15:09
总是在变动，好麻烦。作者: winnie.zt 时间: 2010-12-28 15:14
是的呀，有时候真的很头疼，新奇的东西越来越多，随便什么东西只要好玩点都被人当玩具看了，感觉有点“泛滥”，如果是玩具就得加CE，有趣的是现在CE还不能随便加，你说不是玩具到时候欧盟召回说是玩具，又没加CE还得找麻烦，真纠结！（不过还没看见因为没加CE被召回的玩具，大家有看到通知下我哦！）请大家都发表下高见！！作者: 东拼西凑 时间: 2010-12-29 08:50
以上三个产品都需要当成玩具来测试的，因为如楼主说的，儿童会对其产生兴趣。 3 h7 v( c& R5 [: ?7 n3 l! \/ P9 ~9 m另外吸管除了要满足玩具的要求，还需要满足食品接触材料的要求。作者: winnie.zt 时间: 2010-12-29 10:13
非常感谢！作者: JASONERIC 时间: 2010-12-29 17:19
引用第3楼东拼西凑于2010-12-29 08:50发表的 : % ~8 p: R ` P5 u以上三个产品都需要当成玩具来测试的，因为如楼主说的，儿童会对其产生兴趣。2 n" r0 s" S5 W
另外吸管除了要满足玩具的要求，还需要满足食品接触材料的要求。
W想问下，那是按照什么年龄段去做测试呢，是不是都按照3+的？作者: 东拼西凑 时间: 2010-12-30 08:43
可以定为3+，主要还是要看厂家设计时预定给什么年龄段的群体使用的。作者: daphne 时间: 2011-1-12 10:11
新指令玩具定义只是增加了 “无论是否专门”，以前一些带钥匙环的毛绒挂件，还有一些动物形状的背包，在新指令中都可以定义为玩具，不管它是否有其他的使用功能。只要有玩耍功能即可。 ! d8 x q) }% k! u a5 S: g 9 U: ?' t4 m) M$ z' T上面几个产品在外观上和功能上来说，都比较卡通，有一定的玩耍价值，所以应该按照玩具来进行相关测试。作者: swmcuf181 时间: 2011-5-17 10:35
It there have any guideline for age grade??作者: styu 时间: 2011-5-17 14:19
定义的范围大多了，只要是儿童能玩耍的东西就是，作者: tassx 时间: 2011-5-18 01:20
LZ所谓这种眼镜吸管，夸张设计会吸引儿童喝水时带上它，液体流经眼睛会产生令人感兴趣的效果；另外，这种眼镜可作为 role play 时的配件。5 ?0 f }$ [7 J
3 years old are entering the time of peak pretend play, and like to use replica objects. These children are attracted to props that exhibit a cause-and-effect stimulus. They enjoy dress-up accessories like masks。 n. I: N, [8 D7 t6 H! T/ G
如果眼镜大小适合3+，the item seems appropriate for 3+。 . L. [9 G7 s6 T+ `/ P! E : K) U2 D) l1 f, D" Ttoy 与 non-toy 的一个重要区别是 whether or not a CE mark is applied，但进入欧盟市场，都必须“safe”， 对 non-toy，可在 GPSD 框架下 测试 EN71等。 . R1 A" F, `1 n9 T; D5 U7 g) `* Z0 }
可疑地，新指令不怎么对 primary/secondary function/purpose/play value 作严格区分， 9 m- B' e& L9 c9 L 2 I' o/ F2 d7 X' R9 u4 W5 u" X' t0 J$ s1 Y% F& C% R1 ~
）请大家都发表下高见！！