3岁以上的玩具,都没有滥用测试作者: peterxu 时间: 2010-1-23 16:25
是呀,你说的很对哦,欧洲3+以上没有滥用测试的呀,我突然想起来以前我们送了一款拼图做EN71测试,本身无小部件,年龄3+,外部实验室判我们FAIL,FAIL的原因是 * S; k" Z% G/ _( d% U# \! vRemark No. Nature of Failure 9 c: q7 o9 D+ }*1 Small part was exposed after test. However, the age warning and the indication of hazard was not, H: C0 b; ^) L% v4 r' e3 t
found on the toy or packaging." S9 N# Q5 w( R. e* i( m
不做滥用,那他们是怎么产生的小部件呢?一下子头大了.呵呵作者: hewei 时间: 2010-1-23 17:18
最好发个图片上来看看作者: peterxu 时间: 2010-1-23 19:02
就是一般的拼图,hewei,麻烦你看下...作者: hewei 时间: 2010-1-23 19:44
建议:你还是问下FAILED的检测机构 $ n X* _2 @- Y, b我个人觉得: 如果此拼图测试年龄是3+,则不存在*1 Small part was exposed after test.. However, the age warning and the indication of hazard was not9 z' g+ S$ q7 J; T, T$ |
found on the toy or packaging.作者: ke_cpw 时间: 2010-1-24 00:10
要加鬼仔头 + 小物件警告语$ g; H6 e# N7 Q, G5 y* [
EN 71 -part 1 Toys which are not intended for but MIGHT be dangerous for children under 36 months shall be accompanied by a warning, "Warning! Not suitable for children under 36 months" or "Warning! Not suitable for children under three years" (鬼仔头) 6 q$ q0 Y {4 M/ |8 Z* [ $ _ a( u1 i. t- J3 C( W TOGETHER with a brief indication of the specific hazard calling for this restriction. (小物件警告语) . r' j3 i( \" g+ |3 `1 z' Ifor example choking hazard作者: tassx 时间: 2010-1-24 00:58
主要依 section 7.1 % T2 ?1 |& M2 {; [; y0 A/ Y由于正常使用（接收状态）与滥用的界限并不总是很明了，加之有怎样的危险主要是通过滥用后来界定的，W的大致做法是：测试年龄为0+，然后是否定位3+？ 警告语？作者: 亲亲我的宝贝 时间: 2010-1-24 20:23