安规网

标题: 关于62368 PS2和PS3的问题请教一下,各位大佬! [打印本页]

作者: 夏天的风!!    时间: 2021-11-29 14:24
标题: 关于62368 PS2和PS3的问题请教一下,各位大佬!
If the following materials and parts are not separated from a PIS according to the
% Q9 g0 @+ F3 s) m# [4 u$ L" k8 u( brequirements of 6.4.7, then the materials and parts shall not ignite during single fault' s& F6 ?! {* a  K1 W+ W! H
conditions as specified in 6.4.3.2:' Q. H; o, o6 v6 [: l
– supplies, consumable materials, media and recording materials; and
( O, N2 o5 M4 B: ~1 c& r% D– parts that are required to have particular properties in order to perform intended functions,
; e: B: w. Y' R1 Q3 u; D. p$ qsuch as synthetic rubber rollers, ink tubes and material requiring optical characteristics7 Q0 x! d1 ~: g- R. O
PS2中有明确写到补给材料,介质或消耗材料要与PIS进行隔离,要满足5或13的要求,否者用6.4.3.2的单一故障去豁免
4 i7 }7 ]  M' Q  h; F
: I* V2 }" x8 n7 I" o) _- \- |– by providing a fire enclosure as specified in 6.4.8.6 W# G: q# Z8 r2 X( U9 Y
Within the fire enclosure, combustible materials that do not comply with the flammability
: u3 T& N) [( w& H4 p0 _5 H8 h6 _/ |requirements for PS2 or PS3 circuits shall comply with the flammability test of Clause S.1 or
  L* _8 J+ o3 z0 M  xbe made of V-2 class material, VTM-2 class material or HF-2 class foamed material.6 |) \- H2 K$ W! l/ t/ y7 l
These requirements do not apply to:) b" C+ ~5 r: k, g2 Y
– parts with a volume of less than 1 750 mm3;) c0 q0 F4 T) E
– parts with a mass of combustible material of less than 4 g;: j9 [- h% Z" n1 w" O
– supplies, consumable materials, media and recording materials;( Z1 X3 T+ r1 U
– parts that are required to have particular properties in order to perform intended functions,
( y. t6 H3 Q, v8 V1 b, Xsuch as synthetic rubber rollers, ink tubes and material requiring optical characteristics;
: U7 _& d+ p4 g8 u0 `. p按6.4.8的规定提供防火防护外壳(V-1),不符合PS2或PS3电路一部分的可燃性材料应符合第S.1章的可燃性试验或应用V-2级材料、VTM-2级材料或HF-2级泡沫材料制成,那么这个时候不考虑PIS的距离的问题,如果材料不符合上述要求,用V-0防火防护外壳或者材料安装在V-1印制板上(考虑PIS距离要求),不知道我的理解是否正确,是因为补给材料,介质或消耗材料无法满足V-2或S.1的要求,所以说不适用吗??那么一个终端产品,定期要更换这些材料,是否像PS2要与PIS进行隔离,个人认为要的。( |, f# I2 n! k

8 B, Y! c1 h$ k# d8 u% s. i6 P* i( `5 j4 E% X8 F! ~

作者: 大神    时间: 2021-12-1 09:19
已经使用防火外壳了个人认为不用进行隔离了
作者: 夏天的风!!    时间: 2021-12-1 10:25
大神 发表于 2021-12-1 09:198 Q. E/ A+ p  c; h5 \& h; `
已经使用防火外壳了个人认为不用进行隔离了
& k2 W" z6 z' e  P( r
如果外壳是用V-1的材料,内部可燃性材料(PIS)防火等级低于V-2级材料、VTM-2级材料,那么这个时候补给材料,介质或消耗材料不需要与PIS隔离?
作者: 大神    时间: 2021-12-1 11:59
标准条款都已经很明确说了按6.4.8章节规定提供防火外壳,那这里面已经考量了PIS和外壳的距离。如果距离不满足要求那就要选用V-0的外壳或者满足附录S.2的测试。所以不会存在外壳用V-1但是又不隔离的情况
作者: Samwang    时间: 2021-12-3 17:48
防火V-0外壳了可以不用隔离
作者: rocknan    时间: 2022-3-8 18:33
感覺樓主是不是混為一談了~~? 還是我沒看懂?1 q  a; a) R" i% E5 m0 L
理論上應該是要看 cl 6.4.1 的章節  r! D4 K9 Z6 F( ]4 ^" f; K8 x/ B
看你是要選 reduce the likeihood of ignition 還是選 control fire spread+ F! F* R% E9 g) b- |
reduce the likeihood of ignition 是隔離, X8 B" b/ w3 T' `! q
control fire spread 是材質! D9 h2 O% f3 H8 R9 j
不同的方法, 內文都有引導你要看那些章節
% l; S; X# E5 `3 ]! j6 u% i, A! m/ U




欢迎光临 安规网 (http://bbs2.angui.org/) Powered by Discuz! X3.2