标题: 请教下关于这份关于待机模式的决议 [打印本页] 作者: xielien1010 时间: 2018-11-5 21:19 标题: 请教下关于这份关于待机模式的决议 这份决议看的我云里雾里。。。。请各位帮我解读下哦6 ^& \' Y' s! i& ?% l 作者: plmijb 时间: 2018-11-6 08:14
将内容copy 下来贴上，大家帮你还要花金币下载来看？作者: 非常百事可乐 时间: 2018-11-6 18:00
观点同上楼。金币难赚作者: xielien1010 时间: 2018-11-6 19:46
决议内容 Question: 4 M6 c! ~7 g' Q. \5 k' r3 uBased on the definition in 3.8.2 and taking into account that there is not always an7 g1 Z; G% B+ y! f7 u
stand-by position marked or identified in the appliance operation and there is a need to ; m5 V4 I: P" g$ @6 fdifferentiate the "off" and "stand-by" circuits, at least in the test of 19.11.2 and 22.46, v. P* T; w4 {5 i. z
in the appliance in which 19.11.2 is applicable in stand –by mode according to the " ~: \: N, z q) h( a5 a$ Krelevant parts 2. 5 C$ `7 T% {4 b% _We would like to know if the stand-by circuit include those parts that are energized' r0 T$ A% u+ ^' m2 O
when the appliance is in "0" position. . J- H. G8 `; p4 y/ D7 n" J$ R/ k/ B/ ~6 d
Decision: 3 y9 r, P( Z2 u3 l! f! KIn stand-by, only electronic components that are energized in any of their terminals are 2 H. A3 x) z0 N7 p# o0 b* N3 Ssusceptible to be short circuited according to a) to g) in 19.11.2. ) j1 D+ \ U+ ]$ E8 n5 sIt was agreed that in terms of clause 19 the meaning of "off" correspond to circuits or % P s% Y- c$ Pcomponents that are not energized in any of their terminals.作者: xielien1010 时间: 2018-11-6 19:47